Voxel level p (uncorr) A: Successful No-Go stimuliĬluster level difference A: Time discrimination > temporal order judgmentĬluster level difference C: Pre-Error vs. Gaussian field theory p= 0.05 corrected at cluster level (fmristat program)Ĭlusters of voxels (z > 2.33) with cluster level p corr A Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement (p A: Simon > oddball conditionĬluster level difference A: Oddball > congruentĬluster level difference A: Correct No-Go > correct GOĬluster-size thresholding (120 voxels) voxel level: uncorrected p A: Activation at high load period Permutation Voxel-wise probability Type I error: 0.05Ĭ > A: Successful > unsuccessful inhibitionĬ > A: Unsuccessful inhibition > baseline goĬluster level difference A: Successful oddball > standardĬluster level difference A: Successful > failed stopĬluster level difference A: Effect of attentionĬluster level difference A: Incongruent > oddballĬluster level difference A: Successful-stopĬluster level difference A: Successful inhibition *Ħ contrasts included in the meta-analysis §Ĭluster-wise protection voxel level threshold: p = 0.01 (AFNI AlphaSim)Ĭluster-size thresholding (50 voxels) voxel level: uncorrected p = 0.001 (SPM99)Ĭluster-size thresholding (10 voxels) voxel level: uncorrected p A: Successful inhibitionĬluster-size thresholding (10 voxels) voxel level: uncorrected p AĬluster-size thresholding (137 voxels) voxel-level: uncorrected p A: Successful stop-go trialsĬluster-mass threshold voxel-wide significance: p A: Incongruent-CongruentĬluster-mass threshold voxel-wide significance: p A: Effect of attentionĬluster-mass threshold voxel-wide significance: p C: Overall activationĬluster-size thresholding (3 voxels) voxel-level: p AĬluster-level thresholding (1000 iterations p CĬluster-size thresholding (3 voxels) voxel-level: p A: Unexpected stimulus-Unexpected timeĬluster-size thresholding (5 voxels) voxel-level: p A: Expected stimulus-Unexpected timeĬluster-size thresholding (5 voxels) voxel-level: p A: BackwardĬluster-size thresholding (25 voxels) voxel-level: uncorrected p AĬluster-size thresholding uncorrected p A: averaged 2-and 3-backįamily-wise error correction (p A: Activation in 3-back taskĬorrection applied but type of correction NS (SPM 5)Ĭluster-size thresholding (10 voxels) uncorrected p A: GoĬorrected cluster significance threshold: p= 0.01 (FSL)Ĭluster-size thresholding (10 voxels) voxel-level: uncorrected p AĬluster-size thresholding (84 voxels) voxel-level: uncorrected p A: Negative > neutralĬontiguity threshold (uncorrected p A: Angry > neutral facesĬluster-size thresholding (5 voxels) voxel-level: p A Legend for abbreviations, acronyms and symbols used in the table is provided in the footnote. Table 1Ĭharacteristics of included studies. Additionally, for comparability with the previous meta-analysis (), we also performed a meta-analysis across all pertinent studies reporting results of between-group contrasts, regardless of participant characteristics and specific paradigm tested (“omnibus” meta-analysis).
Significant differences in activation of brain regions between individuals with ADHD and comparisons were detected using activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis (p Comparisons for working memory or vigilance/attention tasks. PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, Web of Science, ERIC, CINHAL, and NeuroSynth were searched for studies published through. To perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of task-based functional MRI studies of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). NIHMS535797-supplement-Supplementary_Table_3.pdf (24K) Abstract Objective
0 kommentar(er)
